Current Science Georgia

Peer-Reviewed Scientific Journal

Editorial Evaluation

Peer Review Policy

Current Science Georgia applies editorial screening and academic evaluation according to manuscript type, subject area, originality, ethical suitability and publication quality requirements.

Initial Editorial Screening

Every submitted manuscript may first undergo editorial screening. This stage checks whether the manuscript is complete, readable, within journal scope, academically structured and suitable for further evaluation.

Screening Criteria

  • Relevance to journal scope
  • Academic presentation and structure
  • Originality and scholarly contribution
  • Ethical suitability
  • Completeness of author information
  • Reference and citation quality
  • Technical file quality

Academic Evaluation

Manuscripts considered suitable after screening may be sent for academic evaluation, reviewer assessment or section-editor review depending on the subject, article type and editorial requirements.

Reviewer Selection

Reviewers or academic evaluators may be selected according to field expertise, academic background, independence, availability and absence of obvious conflict of interest.

Reviewer Responsibilities

  • Evaluate the manuscript objectively and professionally
  • Keep manuscript information confidential
  • Disclose possible conflicts of interest
  • Provide constructive academic comments
  • Avoid personal, discriminatory or irrelevant remarks

Possible Decisions

  • Accept for publication workflow
  • Request minor revision
  • Request major revision
  • Send for further academic evaluation
  • Decline after editorial screening or review

Revision Process

When revision is requested, authors may be asked to submit a revised manuscript and a short response note explaining how editorial or reviewer comments were addressed.

Editorial Independence

Editorial decisions are based on academic suitability, originality, ethical compliance, technical quality and journal standards. Payment, institutional relationship or prior communication does not guarantee acceptance.

Confidentiality

Manuscripts, reviewer comments and editorial communications are treated as confidential materials. They should not be shared publicly without editorial permission.

Conflict of Interest

Editors and reviewers should avoid handling manuscripts where personal, financial, institutional or professional conflicts may compromise impartial evaluation.

Publication Workflow After Acceptance

Accepted manuscripts may proceed to publication fee processing, technical formatting, article record finalization, PDF preparation, archive listing, certificate generation and online verification.

Submit Manuscript

Authors may submit manuscripts online and keep their submission reference for future editorial status tracking.

Submit Manuscript
Important notice: The Article Processing & Publication Fee applies only after editorial acceptance. Payment does not guarantee acceptance and is separate from the peer-review and editorial decision process.